Trans agenda

To wax or not wax

For proof that the woke war on common sense and decency is now completely out of control, look no further than the Canadian trans-waxing controversy. A born male who identifies as female, and whose male genitalia is still intact, is suing female-only waxers on the basis that their refusal to wax his bollocks – sorry, her bollocks – is an act of discrimination. Yes, this person believes that because he identifies as female he should therefore have access to every female service, including the most intimate female services. Any female beautician who refuses to tend to his testicles is being ‘transphobic’, apparently, because they are denying his womanhood. Even though he has a penis. And testicles. And is a man. That’s hate speech, I know.

Advertisements

A Trans-reflection

The word ‘trans’ is a Latin prefix meaning simply “across”, “beyond”, “through,”  “changing throughly,” “transverse”.

Up until some ten years or so ago, the term ‘trans’ was mainly associated with transport, geography and chemistry. Back then, we only encountered it in expressions related to unhealthy foods such as trans-fat or trans-food.

But we have come a long way since those days. Progress progresses and the wheels of Chronos keep turning. Another turn, another gear that moves and clicks into place. Another decade gone. Another non-binary push. Another NWO move to normalize everything that goes against nature. Another push into their wet-dream of a genderless agenda of hyper-sexualized individuals.